The Constrained Instability of Majority Rule: Experiments on the Robustness of the Uncovered Set

The uncovered set has frequently been proposed as a solution concept for majority rule settings. This paper tests this proposition using a new technique for estimating uncovered sets and a series of experiments, including five-player computer-mediated experiments and 35-player paper-format experimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political analysis Vol. 16; no. 2; pp. 115 - 137
Main Authors: Bianco, William T., Lynch, Michael S., Miller, Gary J., Sened, Itai
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, US Cambridge University Press 01-04-2008
Oxford University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The uncovered set has frequently been proposed as a solution concept for majority rule settings. This paper tests this proposition using a new technique for estimating uncovered sets and a series of experiments, including five-player computer-mediated experiments and 35-player paper-format experiments. The results support the theoretic appeal of the uncovered set. Outcomes overwhelmingly lie in or near the uncovered set. Furthermore, when preferences shift, outcomes track the uncovered set. Although outcomes tend to occur within the uncovered set, they are not necessarily stable; majority dominance relationships still produce instability, albeit constrained by the uncovered set.
Bibliography:Authors' note: We thank Matthew M. Schneider for research assistance. We thank James Holloway, Tse-Min Lin, Jim Granato, Randall L. Calvert, Rick K. Wilson, faculty and students of the Juan March Institute, and reviewers of Political Analysis for their very helpful comments and suggestions.
istex:87ABBD995BF12A7DEB7302ECCBF6849373AD0038
ark:/67375/HXZ-BN53BVJW-K
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1047-1987
1476-4989
DOI:10.1093/pan/mpm024