Three-dimensional ultrasound and maternal bonding, a third trimester study and a review

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the effect of third trimester three‐dimensional and four‐dimensional (3D/4D) versus two‐dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) of the fetal face on maternal bonding. Studies quantifying the psychological effect of 3D/4D US on mothers, pregnant of a fetus with no detectable ab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Prenatal diagnosis Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 81 - 88
Main Authors: de Jong-Pleij, E. A. P., Ribbert, L. S. M., Pistorius, L. R., Tromp, E., Mulder, E. J. H., Bilardo, C. M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-01-2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:ABSTRACT Objective To compare the effect of third trimester three‐dimensional and four‐dimensional (3D/4D) versus two‐dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) of the fetal face on maternal bonding. Studies quantifying the psychological effect of 3D/4D US on mothers, pregnant of a fetus with no detectable abnormalities, were reviewed. Methods One hundred sixty Caucasian women attended a third trimester 3D/4D or 2D US examination. Women filled out the Maternal Antenatal Attachment Scale (MAAS) 1 to 2 weeks before (MAAS1) and 1 to 2 weeks after (MAAS2) the US examination. Visibility, recognition and attractiveness were assessed. Results Within both US groups, the MAAS2 scores were significantly higher than the MAAS1 scores (p < 0.0001). No differences in MAAS scores between the US groups emerged. Visibility and recognition were significantly positively related with the increase in MAAS scores (p = 0.003 and p = 0.042) in the 3D/4D group. Of 13 psychological studies, eight studies evaluated bonding and found no difference between 3D/4D and 2D US. The effect of 3D/4D US on satisfaction or perception showed conflicting results, and on anxiety/stress, reduction was the same as after 2D US. Conclusions Bonding increases after either a 3D/4D or 2D US. The effect of 3D/4D US on bonding is stronger at better degrees of visibility and recognition. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. What's already known about this topic? Two‐dimensional ultrasound has positive consequences on maternal–fetal bonding. It is not established that three‐dimensional ultrasound has stronger impact on maternal–fetal bonding than two‐dimensional ultrasound. What does this study add? The effect of three‐dimensional ultrasound on maternal–fetal bonding is stronger at better degrees of visibility and recognition.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-KBNNQ269-K
ArticleID:PD4013
istex:54895B2443EBECE8DCB513EA59C22B6F1BC59237
Conflicts of interest: None declared
Funding sources: None
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0197-3851
1097-0223
DOI:10.1002/pd.4013