(Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults

A crucial step in the establishment of effective policies and regulations concerning legal decisions involving juveniles is the development of a complete understanding of the many factors—psychosocial as well as cognitive—that affect the evolution of judgment over the course of adolescence and into...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral sciences & the law Vol. 18; no. 6; pp. 741 - 760
Main Authors: Cauffman, Elizabeth, Steinberg, Laurence
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-01-2000
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A crucial step in the establishment of effective policies and regulations concerning legal decisions involving juveniles is the development of a complete understanding of the many factors—psychosocial as well as cognitive—that affect the evolution of judgment over the course of adolescence and into adulthood. This study examines the influence of three psychosocial factors (responsibility, perspective, and temperance) on maturity of judgment in a sample of over 1,000 participants ranging in age from 12 to 48 years. Participants completed assessments of their psychosocial maturity in the aforementioned domains and responded to a series of hypothetical decision‐making dilemmas about potentially antisocial or risky behavior. Socially responsible decision making is significantly more common among young adults than among adolescents, but does not increase appreciably after age 19. Individuals exhibiting higher levels of responsibility, perspective, and temperance displayed more mature decision‐making than those with lower scores on these psychosocial factors, regardless of age. Adolescents, on average, scored significantly worse than adults, but individual differences in judgment within each adolescent age group were considerable. These findings call into question recent arguments, derived from studies of logical reasoning, that adolescents and adults are equally competent and that laws and social policies should treat them as such. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:F9E732AB430E62753037918C66F8D89B9E05C3DB
ArticleID:BSL416
This paper is based on Elizabeth Cauffman's doctoral dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology at Temple University. Preparation of this manuscript was supported by the Stanford Center on Adolescence and by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice. Dr. Cauffman wishes to thank research assistants Douglas Ford, Amber May, Christopher Perri, Diana Rivers, Casey Scoggins, Mimi Weiss, and Lisa Yinger. The authors are especially grateful to Shirley Feldman for her helpful suggestions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. This paper was presented as part of a symposium at the 1997 biennial meeting of the Society of Research in Child Development.
ark:/67375/WNG-WNXFJWHX-Q
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0735-3936
1099-0798
DOI:10.1002/bsl.416