Prognostic significance of α‐ and β2‐adrenoceptor gene expression in breast cancer patients

Aims Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed and leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. It was classified within molecular intrinsic subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐enriched and basal‐like. Epinephrine and norepinephrine, released during...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of clinical pharmacology Vol. 85; no. 9; pp. 2143 - 2154
Main Authors: Rivero, Ezequiel Mariano, Martinez, Leandro Marcelo, Bruque, Carlos David, Gargiulo, Lucia, Bruzzone, Ariana, Lüthy, Isabel Alicia
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England John Wiley and Sons Inc 01-09-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed and leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide. It was classified within molecular intrinsic subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐enriched and basal‐like. Epinephrine and norepinephrine, released during stress, bind to adrenoceptors. α2‐adrenoceptors are encoded by the ADRA2A, ADRA2B and ADRA2C genes and β2 by ADRB2. Methods We compiled several publicly available Affymetrix gene expression datasets, obtaining a large cohort of 1924 patients with distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) data and evaluated the association between adrenoceptor expression, clinicopathological markers and outcome. Results ADRA2A high expressing tumours also expressed hormone receptors and presented diminished tumour size, grade and not compromised lymph nodes. ADRB2 high expression was found in smaller, low grade, oestrogen receptor‐positive tumours. Both were significantly associated with the absence of metastasis. High expression of ADRA2C was positively associated with increased tumour size and metastatic relapse. We observed a significant increase in DMFS of patients with high ADRA2A (hazard ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.45–0.65, P < .001) and ADRB2 (0.77, 0.64–0.93, P = .006) expression and a decrease with ADRA2C high expression (1.45, 1.16–1.81, P = .001). For patients with luminal tumours, ADRA2A was the only factor that retained its significance as an independent predictor of DMFS while ADRA2C expression was an independent predictor for worse prognosis in basal‐like tumours. Conclusions We herein provide new insight for a potential role of ADRA2A and ADRA2C in breast cancer. In low‐ and medium‐income countries, their incorporation to routine immunohistochemistry analysis of biopsies or tumour samples, could provide additional low‐cost prognostic factors.
Bibliography:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
All the patients are from microarray gene expression datasets from primary breast cancer samples publicly available at the Gene Expression Omnibus
.
The authors confirm that the PI for this paper is Isabel Alicia Lüthy.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
All the patients are from microarray gene expression datasets from primary breast cancer samples publicly available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/).
ISSN:0306-5251
1365-2125
DOI:10.1111/bcp.14030