Quality of information about maxillofacial trauma on the Internet

• Published in: British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery Vol. 55; no. 2; pp. 141 - 144
• Main Authors: McGoldrick, D.M, Kielty, P, Cotter, C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01-02-2017
• Subjects: Benchmarking; Consumer Health Information; Dentistry; DISCERN; Health Education; Humans; Internet; Maxillofacial; Maxillofacial Injuries; Self Report; Surgery; Trauma; Internet; Trauma; DISCERN; Maxillofacial
• ISSN: 0266-4356; 1532-1940
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.09.020

Abstract Patients increasingly search the Internet for information about health and potential treatments, but the content and accuracy of some websites are questionable. To evaluate the quality of information on maxillofacial trauma, we searched for the terms “jaw fracture” and “cheekbone fracture” on Google, Yahoo, and Bing. We assessed the first 10 results of each search and excluded duplicates or those that were unrelated. We then used the DISCERN tool and the JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) benchmarks to assess those that remained. Of the original 60 found, 38 were excluded (29 duplicates, 9 unrelated). The mean (range) DISCERN score for each search was 38.5 (27–57) for jaw fracture and 41.9 (26–61) for cheekbone fracture. No website achieved an excellent score (more than 63), and over three-quarters were categorised as poor (27–38) or fair (39–50). None met all the JAMA benchmarks, but most adhered to at least two. The standard of online information on maxillofacial trauma varies, but is generally of poor quality. Patients should therefore be advised to be cautious of online sources and should be directed towards higher-quality websites.