Randomized phase II–III study of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer: results from the IFCT-0802 trial

IFCT study administering 7.5 mg/kg Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy after chemotherapy induction did not improve outcomes in extensive SCLC patients. This randomized phase II–III trial sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab (Bev) following induction chemotherapy (CT) in extens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of oncology Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 908 - 914
Main Authors: Pujol, J.-L., Lavole, A., Quoix, E., Molinier, O., Souquet, P.-J., Barlesi, F., Le Caer, H., Moro-Sibilot, D., Fournel, P., Oster, J.P., Chatellain, P., Barre, P., Jeannin, G., Mourlanette, P., Derollez, M., Herman, D., Renault, A., Dayen, C., Lamy, P.J., Langlais, A., Morin, F., Zalcman, G., Westeel, V., Poudenx, M., Mazieres, J., Martinet, Y., Gury, J-P., Baize, N., Dumont, P., Vaylet, F., Foucher, P., Dauba, J., Tredaniel, J., Laize, H., Petit, L., Coëtmeur, D., Doubre, H., Pichon, E., Schneider, S., Goutorbe, F., Gervais, R., Zaegel, M., Dehette, S., Coudert, B., Duhamel, J-P., Dixmier, A., Thiberville, L., Deguiral, P., Monnot, H., Romand, P., Berard, H., Raspaud, C.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-05-2015
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IFCT study administering 7.5 mg/kg Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy after chemotherapy induction did not improve outcomes in extensive SCLC patients. This randomized phase II–III trial sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding bevacizumab (Bev) following induction chemotherapy (CT) in extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Enrolled SCLC patients received two induction cycles of CT. Responders were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive four additional cycles of CT alone or CT plus Bev (7.5 mg/kg), followed by single-agent Bev until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the percentage of patients for whom disease remained controlled (still in response) at the fourth cycle. In total, 147 patients were enrolled. Partial response was observed in 103 patients, 74 of whom were eligible for Bev and randomly assigned to the CT alone group (n = 37) or the CT plus Bev group (n = 37). Response assessment at the end of the fourth cycle showed that disease control did not differ between the two groups (89.2% versus 91.9% of patients remaining responders in CT alone versus CT plus Bev, respectively; Fisher's exact test: P = 1.00). Progression-free survival (PFS) since randomization did not significantly differ, with a median PFS of 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9% to 6.0%] versus 5.3 months (95% CI 4.8% to 5.8%) in the CT alone and CT plus Bev groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) for CT alone: 1.1; 95% CI 0.7% to 1.7%; unadjusted P = 0.82]. Grade ≥2 hypertension and grade ≥3 thrombotic events were observed in 40% and 11% of patients, respectively, in the CT plus Bev group. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and soluble VEGF receptor titrations failed to identify predictive biomarkers. Administering 7.5 mg/kg Bev after induction did not improve outcome in extensive SCLC patients.
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdv065