Macular pigment density at the site of altered fundus autofluorescence

• Published in: Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology Vol. 249; no. 4; pp. 499 - 504
• Main Authors: Rothenbuehler, Simon Paul, Wolf-Schnurrbusch, Ute E. K., Wolf, Sebastian
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 01-04-2011; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Fluorescein Angiography; Humans; Lasers; Lutein - metabolism; Macular Degeneration - metabolism; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Ophthalmology; Ophthalmoscopy; Prospective Studies; Retinal Disorders; Retinal Pigments - metabolism; Xanthophylls - metabolism; Zeaxanthins; Fundus autofluorescence; Macular pigment; Age-related macular degeneration; Age-related maculopathy
• ISSN: 0721-832X; 1435-702X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00417-010-1528-1

Background
The purpose of our study was to determine whether abnormalities of increased or decreased fundus autofluorescence (FAF) are associated with local changes in macular pigment (MP) optical density in patients with age-related maculopathy (ARM) and macular degeneration (ARMD).
Methods
FAF imaging and MP measurement was performed through dilated pupils using a modified confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA, Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) according to a standard protocol. Two-wavelength autofluorescence method was employed for determination of local macular pigment optical density (LMPOD). Image analysis and measurement of LMPOD at the area of altered FAF was performed using Heidelberg Eye Explorer Software. Mean values of LMPOD at the site of FAF abnormality were compared to an adjacent location with normal background FAF of the same image.
Results
Sixty-three eyes of 63 patients (28 male, 35 female, mean age 75.8 ± 8.8 years) were included in this analysis. Group 1 comprised 31 cases with focal increased FAF. Mean LMPOD in the area of increased FAF was 0.073 ± 0.083 compared to 0.075 ± 0.074 in the adjacent area of normal FAF. Group 2 comprised 32 cases of focal decreased FAF. Mean LMPOD in the area of decreased FAF was –0.004 ± 0.088 compared 0.053 ± 0.075 in the adjacent area of normal FAF. The site of increased FAF showed no significant difference in LMPOD (
p
 = 0.927) compared to adjacent areas of normal FAF, while areas of decreased FAF revealed significantly lower LMPOD (
p
 = 0.001) compared to adjacent areas of normal FAF.
Conclusions
Focal increases of FAF due to ARM or ARMD did not lead to change in LMPOD. Presumably, retinal layers containing MP are unaffected by these processes. For lesions exhibiting focal decreased FAF, a reduction of LMPOD cannot be excluded. Further studies are needed to investigate MP in the course of disease.