Individual differences in susceptibility to memory illusions

Forty‐two individuals studied sixteen word lists, each of which converged on a common list associate that was not studied. Ten measures of individual differences in cognition and personality were also administered. The tendency to intrude words in recall and to falsely recognize distractor words in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied cognitive psychology Vol. 12; no. 7; pp. S5 - S27
Main Authors: Winograd, Eugene, Peluso, Jennifer P., Glover, Todd A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: West Sussex John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-12-1998
Wiley
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Forty‐two individuals studied sixteen word lists, each of which converged on a common list associate that was not studied. Ten measures of individual differences in cognition and personality were also administered. The tendency to intrude words in recall and to falsely recognize distractor words in a recognition memory test were significantly correlated with reports of dissociative experiences and vivid mental imagery. It is argued that the memory errors, as well as the reports of dissociative experiences, reflect difficulties in source monitoring, in particular, in the discrimination of events that originate externally from those that originate internally. Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:istex:E6B595C2AEB5103A3591EF4659EA04971D94E5C1
ArticleID:ACP553
ark:/67375/WNG-SQCZSTWN-X
ISSN:0888-4080
1099-0720
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199812)12:7<S5::AID-ACP553>3.0.CO;2-D