Laser atherectomy for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease

Abstract OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical results of laser atherectomy in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. METHODS Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing laser atherectomy at a single institution during a seven year period by vascular surgeons and interventional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of vascular surgery Vol. 44; pp. 269 - 276
Main Authors: Mallios, Alexandros, MD, Blebea, John, MD, MBA, Buster, Bryan, MD, Messiner, Ryan, MD, Taubman, Kevin, MD, MA, Harry, MD, PhD
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01-10-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical results of laser atherectomy in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. METHODS Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing laser atherectomy at a single institution during a seven year period by vascular surgeons and interventional cardiologists in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Clinical data was retrieved from patient charts and hospital electronic medical records along with the associated arteriograms. RESULTS A total of 461 lesions in 343 limbs were treated in 300 patients with a mean age of 70 years. The indication was critical limb ischemia (CLI) with rest pain or tissue loss in 227 (66%) of interventions and claudication in 116 (34%). All procedures included an associated balloon angioplasty while stenting was performed in 33%.Technical success was achieved in 99% with only 2 (<1%) cases with an acute procedure-related complication requiring surgical intervention. At a mean follow up of 28 months (range 1-87 months – median 24 months), 156 patients (45%) became asymptomatic or achieved significant clinical improvement (resolution of tissue loss or rest pain), 60 (17%) remained with CLI, 30 (9%) had a major proximal amputation, and 18 (5%) had a minor amputation. Freedom from major amputation was 90% at five years by life table analysis. Univariate statistical analysis demonstrated the risk of a major amputation to be associated with diabetes, hemodialysis and tissue loss (P<0.05 to P<0.005) while multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated diabetes to be overwhelmingly important (RR: 4.84, 95% CI: 1.1-21.3, P < 0.05). In a similar manner, multivariate analysis indicated dialysis (RR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.01-5.98, P < 0.05) and critical limb ischemia (RR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.42-3.65, P < 0.01) were associated with higher likelihood for lack of clinical improvement. There was no difference in major amputation rates between surgeons and interventional cardiologists (RR: 1.5, 95% CI:, P<0.1) although it was three times more likely for the patients treated by surgeons to suffer from CLI (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.9-5.4, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Laser atherectomy is a safe and useful adjunct in limb salvage. Diabetics have much higher probability of requiring a proximal amputation while those on dialysis and with critical limb ischemia are least likely to gain clinical benefit.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0890-5096
1615-5947
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.013