Magnetoelastic transition and magnetocaloric effect in induction melted Fe100−xRhx bulk alloys with x = 50, 51

•Poor reproducibility an bulk FeRh alloys produced by arc melting.•Fe100−xRhx alloys with x = 50, 50.5 and 51 prepared by induction melting.•Comparison of the magnetocaloric responses and phase transition features.•Induction melting is advantageous to prepare FeRh binary alloys.•Fe content influence...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of alloys and compounds Vol. 871; p. 159586
Main Authors: Arreguín-Hernández, M.L., Sánchez-Valdés, C.F., Llamazares, J.L. Sánchez, Ríos-Jara, D., Pecharsky, V.K., Blinov, M.I., Prudnikov, V.N., Kovalev, B.B., Zverev, V.I., Tishin, A.M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Lausanne Elsevier B.V 05-08-2021
Elsevier BV
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Poor reproducibility an bulk FeRh alloys produced by arc melting.•Fe100−xRhx alloys with x = 50, 50.5 and 51 prepared by induction melting.•Comparison of the magnetocaloric responses and phase transition features.•Induction melting is advantageous to prepare FeRh binary alloys.•Fe content influences the reproducibility of the phase transition features•Further studies about the impact of synthesis parameters are necessary. Magnetoelastic transitions (METs) in bulk in nearly equiatomic Fe-Rh alloys produced by arc melting may show poor reproducibility related to insufficient chemical homogeneity and presence of impurity phases in variable concentrations. To better understand the synthesis conditions that reliably yield bulk FeRh materials with reproducible MET characteristics, Fe100-xRhx alloys with x = 50, 50.5 and 51 at. % were prepared by induction melting and thermal annealing under identical conditions. The fabricated samples were cut into several slices, followed by characterization of METs in each of the slices using isothermal and isofield magnetization measurements, differential scanning calorimetry, and direct measurements of the magnetocaloric effect. All of the slices exhibit METs between the AFM and FM states, but the transitions are abrupt with nearly the same change of magnetization, ΔM, when x = 50.5 and 51, whereas for the x = 50 alloy the transition spreads over a wide temperature interval and ΔM may fluctuate by as much as 10 % from one specimen to another. A comparison of the magnetocaloric responses of x = 50 and 51 materials is presented. The clearly different effect of the magnetic field on the transition in both directions leads to significant differences in the reversibility and maximum values of the magnetic field-induced entropy and adiabatic temperature changes, as well as average hysteresis losses. In terms of reproducibility, our results suggest that induction melting is a more appropriate technique to prepare these binary alloys.
Bibliography:USDOE
AC02-07CH11358; A1-S-37066; 861512
SEP-CONACyT
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES). Materials Sciences & Engineering Division
IS-J-10,452
ISSN:0925-8388
1873-4669
DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159586