Carotid plaque characterization using 3D T1-weighted MR imaging with histopathologic validation: a comparison with 2D technique

• Published in: American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 751 - 756
• Main Authors: Narumi, S, Sasaki, M, Natori, T, Yamaguchi Oura, M, Ogasawara, K, Kobayashi, M, Sato, Y, Ogasawara, Y, Hitomi, J, Terayama, Y
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Society of Neuroradiology 01-04-2015
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Carotid Arteries - pathology; Extracranial Vascular; Female; Humans; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Plaque, Atherosclerotic - classification; Plaque, Atherosclerotic - pathology; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0195-6108; 1936-959X
• DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4197

3D FSE T1WI has recently been used for carotid plaque imaging, given the potential advantages in contrast and spatial resolutions. However, its diagnostic performance remains unclear. Hence, we compared the ability of this technique to readily assess plaque characteristics with that of conventional images and validated the results with histologic classification.
We prospectively examined 34 patients with carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy by using 1.5T scanners and obtained 3D-FSE T1WI and 2D spin-echo T1WI scans. After generating reformatted images obtained from the 3D-FSE T1-weighted images, we calculated the contrast ratios for the plaques and the adjacent muscles and compared these findings with the pathologic classifications.
Carotid plaques were histologically classified as types VII, VIII, IV-V, or VI. With 3D-FSE T1WI, the range of contrast ratios for each classification was the following: 0.94-0.97 (median, 0.95), 0.95-1.29 (median, 1.10), 1.33-1.54 (median, 1.42), and 1.53-2.12 (median, 1.80), respectively. With 2D imaging, the range of contrast ratios for each classification was the following: 0.79-1.02 (median, 0.90), 0.88-1.19 (median, 1.01), 1.17-1.46 (median, 1.23), and 1.55-2.51 (median, 2.07), respectively. Results were significantly different among the 4 groups (P < .001). Sensitivity and specificity for discriminating vulnerable plaques (IV-VI) from stable plaques (VII, VIII) were both 100% for the 3D technique and 100% and 91%, respectively, for the 2D technique.
3D-FSE T1WI accurately characterizes intraplaque components of the carotid artery, with excellent sensitivity and specificity compared with those of 2D-T1WI.