A Comparative Analysis of the 'Green' Techniques Applied for Polyphenols Extraction from Bioresources

From all the valuable biomass extractives, polyphenols are a widespread group of secondary metabolites found in all plants, representing the most desirable phytochemicals due to their potential to be used as additives in food industry, cosmetics, medicine, and others fields. At present, there is an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemistry & biodiversity Vol. 12; no. 11; pp. 1635 - 1651
Main Authors: Talmaciu, Adina Iulia, Volf, Irina, Popa, Valentin I.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Zürich WILEY-VCH Verlag 01-11-2015
WILEY‐VCH Verlag
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:From all the valuable biomass extractives, polyphenols are a widespread group of secondary metabolites found in all plants, representing the most desirable phytochemicals due to their potential to be used as additives in food industry, cosmetics, medicine, and others fields. At present, there is an increased interest to recover them from plant of spontaneous flora, cultivated plant, and wastes resulted in agricultural and food industry. That is why many efforts have been made to provide a highly sensitive, efficiently, and eco‐friendly methods, for the extraction of polyphenols, according to the green chemistry and sustainable development concepts. Many extraction procedures are known with advantages and disadvantages. From these reasons, the aim of this article is to provide a comparative analysis regarding technical and economical aspects related to the most innovative extraction techniques studied in the last time: microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), and ultrasound‐assisted extraction (UAE).
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-W949K7DV-6
istex:8382D0A56A18D489CEC34538DE33779AD07BF8FC
ArticleID:CBDV201400415
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1612-1872
1612-1880
DOI:10.1002/cbdv.201400415