Reputation for cooperation: contingent benefits in alliance activity
We model the two-firm alliance as an iterated prisoners' dilemma game with an exit option and test several theoretical predictions in experimental studies regarding the effect of reputation information. Following the literature, we hypothesize that reputation benefits cooperation; however, our...
Saved in:
Published in: | Strategic management journal Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 371 - 385 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-04-2009
John Wiley and Sons Wiley Periodicals Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We model the two-firm alliance as an iterated prisoners' dilemma game with an exit option and test several theoretical predictions in experimental studies regarding the effect of reputation information. Following the literature, we hypothesize that reputation benefits cooperation; however, our experimental results instead show that reputation decreases cooperation. A contingency explains this result while remaining consistent with the general proposition of reputation as beneficial in games of incomplete information. Implications include a recommendation for when to invest in reputation and whether the lemon's market story is applicable to alliance-related inefficiencies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-FMPG3GCM-J istex:FE6F5AE097330BE85436A0EF8CB1E845416A8164 ArticleID:SMJ740 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0143-2095 1097-0266 |
DOI: | 10.1002/smj.740 |