Reputation for cooperation: contingent benefits in alliance activity

We model the two-firm alliance as an iterated prisoners' dilemma game with an exit option and test several theoretical predictions in experimental studies regarding the effect of reputation information. Following the literature, we hypothesize that reputation benefits cooperation; however, our...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Strategic management journal Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 371 - 385
Main Author: Arend, Richard J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-04-2009
John Wiley and Sons
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We model the two-firm alliance as an iterated prisoners' dilemma game with an exit option and test several theoretical predictions in experimental studies regarding the effect of reputation information. Following the literature, we hypothesize that reputation benefits cooperation; however, our experimental results instead show that reputation decreases cooperation. A contingency explains this result while remaining consistent with the general proposition of reputation as beneficial in games of incomplete information. Implications include a recommendation for when to invest in reputation and whether the lemon's market story is applicable to alliance-related inefficiencies.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-FMPG3GCM-J
istex:FE6F5AE097330BE85436A0EF8CB1E845416A8164
ArticleID:SMJ740
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-2095
1097-0266
DOI:10.1002/smj.740