Timescales of Quantum Equilibration, Dissipation and Fluctuation in Nuclear Collisions

Understanding the dynamics of equilibration processes in quantum systems as well as their interplay with dissipation and fluctuation is a major challenge in quantum many-body theory. The timescales of such processes are investigated in collisions of atomic nuclei using fully microscopic approaches....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review letters Vol. 124; no. 21; pp. 1 - 212504
Main Authors: Simenel, C., Godbey, K., Umar, A. S.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: College Park American Physical Society 29-05-2020
American Physical Society (APS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Understanding the dynamics of equilibration processes in quantum systems as well as their interplay with dissipation and fluctuation is a major challenge in quantum many-body theory. The timescales of such processes are investigated in collisions of atomic nuclei using fully microscopic approaches. Results from time-dependent Hartree-Fock and time-dependent random-phase approximation calculations are compared for 13 systems over a broad range of energies. The timescale for full mass equilibration (∼2×10−20  s) is found to be much larger than timescales for neutron-to-proton equilibration, kinetic energy, and angular momentum dissipations which are on the order of 10−21  s. Fluctuations of mass numbers in the fragments and correlations between their neutron and proton numbers build up within only a few 10−21 s. This indicates that dissipation is basically not impacted by mass equilibration, but is mostly driven by the exchange of nucleons between the fragments.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Australian Research Council (ARC)
SC0013847; DP160101254; DP190100256
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)
ISSN:0031-9007
1079-7114
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.212504