Comparison of 5 Surgical Techniques for Partial Liver Lobectomy in the Dog for Intraoperative Blood Loss and Surgical Time

To compare surgical time and intraoperative blood loss for 5 partial liver lobectomy techniques in the dog. Experimental in vivo study. Dogs (n=10). Five surgical techniques (SurgiTie[trade mark sign]; LigaSure[trade mark sign]; Ultracision® Harmonic Scalpel [UAS]; Suction+Clip; Suction+thoracoabdom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Veterinary surgery Vol. 39; no. 7; pp. 856 - 862
Main Authors: Risselada, Marije, Ellison, Gary W, Bacon, Nicholas J, Polyak, Maximilian M.R, van Gilder, Jim, Kirkby, Kristin, Kim, Stanley E
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-10-2010
Blackwell Publishing Inc
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To compare surgical time and intraoperative blood loss for 5 partial liver lobectomy techniques in the dog. Experimental in vivo study. Dogs (n=10). Five surgical techniques (SurgiTie[trade mark sign]; LigaSure[trade mark sign]; Ultracision® Harmonic Scalpel [UAS]; Suction+Clip; Suction+thoracoabdominal stapler [TA]) for partial liver lobectomy in dogs were evaluated and compared for total surgical time and intraoperative blood loss. Body weight, activated clotting time (ACT), heart rate, and intraoperative blood pressure (BP) were recorded. Blood loss was determined by adding the weight of the blood soaked sponges during surgery (1 g=1 mL) to the amount of suctioned blood (mL). Surgical time (in seconds) was determined from the start of the lobectomy until cessation of bleeding from the stump. Mean surgical time and mean blood loss for each technique were compared using a Tukey's multiple comparison test. No significant differences were found between dogs for weight, ACT, heart rate, and intraoperative BP. No complications were seen with the SurgiTie[trade mark sign] technique in 9 of 10 cases. There was no significant difference in surgical time between techniques however there was a significant difference for blood loss; the Suction+Clip method had significantly more blood loss than the other techniques. Skeletonization of the lobar vessels before individually clipping them (Suction+Clip) resulted in a higher blood loss than using Suction+TA, UAS, SurgiTie[trade mark sign] or the LigaSure[trade mark sign] device. The SurgiTie[trade mark sign] appears to be an acceptable method for partial liver lobectomy. Although skeletonization and individually clipping the vessels had the highest blood loss, it still was <7.5% of total blood volume. All 5 techniques should be safe for clinical use in small to medium sized dogs up to 26 kg.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00719.x
istex:58964CB1693855AC6F592DEFE7E148C1B621792C
ArticleID:VSU00719
ark:/67375/WNG-4J8LGGCP-H
Presented in part at the 2008 ACVS Symposium, October 22–25, 2008, San Diego, CA.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0161-3499
1532-950X
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2010.00719.x