Long-term outcome of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: Importance of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation angiographic grading scale
Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major complication limiting long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). However, long-term outcome data of HTx recipients with detailed information on angiographic severity are scarce. The study included 501 HTx recipients with angiographic follow-...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of heart and lung transplantation Vol. 38; no. 11; pp. 1189 - 1196 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01-11-2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major complication limiting long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx). However, long-term outcome data of HTx recipients with detailed information on angiographic severity are scarce.
The study included 501 HTx recipients with angiographic follow-up up to 20 years post-transplant. All coronary angiograms were classified according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grading scale.
CAV prevalence increased over time after transplantation, reaching 10% at 1 year, 44% at 10 years, and 59% at 20 years. Older donor age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38 per 10 years, 1.20–1.59, p < 0.001), male donor sex (HR 1.86, 1.31–2.64, p < 0.001), stroke as donor cause of death (HR 1.47, 1.04–2.09, p = 0.03), recipient pre-transplant hemodynamic instability (HR 1.79, 1.15–2.77, p = 0.01), post-transplant smoking (HR 1.59, 1.06–2.39, p = 0.03), and first-year treated rejection episodes (HR 1.49, 1.01–2.20, p = 0.046) were independent risk factors for CAV. Baseline anti-metabolite drug use (HR 0.57, 0.34–0.95, p = 0.03) and more recent transplant date (HR 0.78 per 10 years, 0.62–0.99, p = 0.04) were protective factors. Compared with patients without CAV, the HR for death or retransplantation was 1.22 (0.85–1.76, p = 0.28) for CAV 1, 1.86 (1.08–3.22, p = 0.03) for CAV 2, and 5.71 (3.64–8.94, p < 0.001) for CAV 3.
CAV is highly prevalent in HTx recipients and is explained by immunologic and non-immunologic factors. Higher ISHLT CAV grades are independently associated with worse graft survival. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1053-2498 1557-3117 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.005 |