Explaining the Effects of Clouds on Remote Sensing Scene Classification

Most of Earth is covered by haze or clouds, impeding the constant monitoring of our planet. Preceding works have documented the detrimental effects of cloud coverage on remote sensing applications and proposed ways to approach this issue. However, up to now, little effort has been spent on understan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing Vol. 15; pp. 9976 - 9986
Main Authors: Gawlikowski, Jakob, Ebel, Patrick, Schmitt, Michael, Zhu, Xiao Xiang
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Piscataway IEEE 2022
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Most of Earth is covered by haze or clouds, impeding the constant monitoring of our planet. Preceding works have documented the detrimental effects of cloud coverage on remote sensing applications and proposed ways to approach this issue. However, up to now, little effort has been spent on understanding how exactly atmospheric disturbances impede the application of modern machine learning methods to Earth observation data. Specifically, we consider the effects of haze and cloud coverage on a scene classification task. We provide a thorough investigation of how classifiers trained on cloud-free data fail once they encounter noisy imagery-a common scenario encountered when deploying pretrained models for remote sensing to real use cases. We show how and why remote sensing scene classification suffers from cloud coverage. Based on a multistage analysis, including explainability approaches applied to the predictions, we work out four different types of effects that clouds have on scene prediction. The contribution of our work is to deepen the understanding of the effects of clouds on common remote sensing applications and consequently guide the development of more robust methods.
ISSN:1939-1404
2151-1535
DOI:10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3221788