The GPM Validation Network and Evaluation of Satellite-Based Retrievals of the Rain Drop Size Distribution

• Published in: Atmosphere Vol. 11; no. 9; p. 1010
• Main Authors: Gatlin, Patrick N., Petersen, Walter A., Pippitt, Jason L., Berendes, Todd A., Wolff, David B., Tokay, Ali
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 01-09-2020
• Subjects: microphysics; precipitation; remote sensing
• ISSN: 2073-4433; 2073-4433
• DOI: 10.3390/atmos11091010

A unique capability of the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission is its ability to better estimate the raindrop size distribution (DSD) on a global scale. To validate the GPM DSD retrievals, a network of more than 100 ground-based polarimetric radars from across the globe are utilized within the broader context of the GPM Validation Network (VN) processing architecture. The GPM VN ensures quality controlled dual-polarimetric radar moments for use in providing reference estimates of the DSD. The VN DSD estimates are carefully geometrically matched with the GPM core satellite measurements for evaluation of the GPM algorithms. We use the GPM VN to compare the DSD retrievals from the GPM’s Dual-frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) and combined DPR–GPM Microwave Imager (GMI) Level-2 algorithms. Results suggested that the Version 06A GPM core satellite algorithms provide estimates of the mass-weighted mean diameter (Dm) that are biased 0.2 mm too large when considered across all precipitation types. In convective precipitation, the algorithms tend to overestimate Dm by 0.5–0.6 mm, leading the DPR algorithm to underestimate the normalized DSD intercept parameter (Nw) by a factor of two, and introduce a significant bias to the DPR retrievals of rainfall rate for DSDs with large Dm. The GPM Combined algorithm performs better than the DPR algorithm in convection but provides a severely limited range of Nw estimates, highlighting the need to broaden its a priori database in convective precipitation.