Comparison of gated and nongated fast multislice black-blood carotid imaging using rapid extended coverage and inflow/outflow saturation techniques

Purpose To comparatively analyze two fast in vivo multislice black‐blood carotid artery vessel wall imaging techniques with and without cardiac gating. Materials and Methods Eight subjects with carotid artery atherosclerosis, and four healthy subjects were studied using two black‐blood multislice te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 22; no. 5; pp. 628 - 633
Main Authors: Mani, Venkatesh, Itskovich, Vitalii V., Aguiar, Silvia H., Mizsei, Gabor, Aguinaldo, Juan Gilberto S., Samber PE, Daniel D., Macaluso, Frank M., Fayad, Zahi A.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01-11-2005
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To comparatively analyze two fast in vivo multislice black‐blood carotid artery vessel wall imaging techniques with and without cardiac gating. Materials and Methods Eight subjects with carotid artery atherosclerosis, and four healthy subjects were studied using two black‐blood multislice techniques: rapid extended coverage double inversion recovery (REX‐DIR), and inflow/outflow saturation band (IOSB) rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) multislice acquisitions. Quantitative, qualitative, and morphometric analyses were performed on images. Results Gating produced significantly lower values for the REX‐DIR sequence with respect to signal intensity in muscle and the carotid artery wall, whereas it had no effect on flow suppression compared to nongated images. For the IOSB sequences, gating had no significant effect on signal intensity of muscle and the carotid artery wall, but worsened flow suppression. REX‐DIR and IOSB sequences were statistically different with respect to signal intensity of muscle (with REX‐DIR sequences having lower values), while no statistical significance was observed for flow suppression and wall delineation. A morphologic analysis of the vessel wall and lumen comparing REX‐DIR gated, IOSB gated, REX‐DIR nongated, and IOSB nongated sequences revealed no significant differences between the acquisition techniques tested. Conclusion Nongated sequences may be used instead of gated sequences in atherosclerotic vessel wall imaging without compromising image quality. This may shorten examination time and improve patient comfort. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JMRI20428
Peter Jay Sharp Foundation
Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute
ark:/67375/WNG-J0MZPL2V-8
Eva and Morris Feld Estate
Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Cardiovascular Health Center
NIH/NHLBI - No. RO1 HL71021
Louis B. Mayer Foundation
istex:C3F0CD427B6657B76843F1D5BC47D0786D796CB6
Herman Goldman Foundation
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.20428