Management of splenic trauma: the Durban experience

• Published in: British journal of surgery Vol. 72; no. 8; p. 634
• Main Authors: Chadwick, S J, Huizinga, W K, Baker, L W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-08-1985
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Ligation; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Spleen - injuries; Spleen - surgery; Splenectomy; Splenic Artery - surgery; Sutures; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - surgery; Wounds, Penetrating - surgery
• ISSN: 0007-1323
• DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720817

In a retrospective survey of splenic trauma managed at a teaching hospital, the data of 127 patients during a 2 year period have been analysed. Splenic conservation was achieved in 47 laparotomies (38.8 per cent). Six patients with blunt abdominal trauma (4.7 per cent of all patients) were managed non-operatively. Splenic conservation by suture with or without packing with omentum or oxidized cellulose was successful in 27 out of 37 attempts. Failure of this technique was easily recognized during laparotomy and no patient required re-operation for continued splenic bleeding after splenorrhaphy. There was no significant difference between successful conservation of the spleen at laparotomy of patients below the median age (28 years) and older patients. Wound sepsis was increased after splenectomy (P less than 0.05). Splenic conservation is not appropriate for all types of splenic injury. Where conservation is not possible splenectomy and re-implantation is recommended.