Patient and tumour characteristics of screening‐age adults diagnosed with screen‐detected versus symptomatic colon cancer

Aim International studies have shown that most colon cancers are diagnosed among people with symptoms, but research is limited in the United States. Here, we conducted a retrospective study of adults aged 50–85 years diagnosed with stage I–IIIA colon cancer between 1995 and 2014 in two US healthcare...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Colorectal disease Vol. 24; no. 11; pp. 1344 - 1351
Main Authors: Sarma, Elizabeth A., Thompson, Matthew J., Bowles, Erin J. A., Burnett‐Hartman, Andrea N., Hubbard, Rebecca A., Yu, Onchee, Chubak, Jessica
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-11-2022
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim International studies have shown that most colon cancers are diagnosed among people with symptoms, but research is limited in the United States. Here, we conducted a retrospective study of adults aged 50–85 years diagnosed with stage I–IIIA colon cancer between 1995 and 2014 in two US healthcare systems. Methods Mode of detection (screening or symptomatic) was ascertained from medical records. We estimated unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing detection mode by patient factors at diagnosis (year, age, sex, race, smoking status, body mass index [BMI], Charlson score), prediagnostic primary care utilization, and tumour characteristics (stage, location). Results Of 1,675 people with colon cancer, 38.4% were screen‐detected, while 61.6% were diagnosed following symptomatic presentation. Screen‐detected cancer was more common among those diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 versus 1995–1999 (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.19–2.28), and those with a BMI of 25–<30 kg/m2 (OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21–1.98) or ≥30 kg/m2 (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.18–1.96) versus <25 kg/m2. Screen‐detected cancer was less common among people aged 76–85 (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.39–0.65) versus 50–64, those with comorbidity scores >0 (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56–0.91 for score = 1, OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.26–0.45 for score = 2+), and those with 2+ prediagnostic primary care visits (OR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.37–0.76) versus 0 visits. The odds of screen detection were lower among patients diagnosed with stage IIA (OR 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27–0.41) or IIB (OR 0.12, 95% CI: 0.06–0.24) cancers versus stage I. Conclusions Most colon cancers among screen‐eligible adults were diagnosed following symptomatic presentation. Even with increasing screening rates over time, research is needed to better understand why specific groups are more likely to be diagnosed when symptomatic and identify opportunities for interventions.
Bibliography:Funding information
The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or United States Government.
Disclaimer
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers R01CA172073 (Chubak) and R50CA211115 (Bowles). The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the Cancer Surveillance System of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, which is funded by Contract No. N01‐CN‐67009 and N01‐PC‐35142 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute with additional support from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the State of Washington. Dr. Thompson is supported by Cancer Research UK CanTest award at the University of Washington. Funders did not participate in the design, data collection, manuscript drafting, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/codi.16232