A new correction technique for measuring respiratory impedance through an endotracheal tube

• Published in: The European respiratory journal Vol. 9; no. 5; pp. 1079 - 1086
• Main Authors: Lorino, AM, Beydon, L, Mariette, C, Dahan, E, Lorino, H
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Leeds Eur Respiratory Soc 01-05-1996; Maney
• Subjects: Airway Resistance; Algorithms; Biological and medical sciences; Electric Impedance; Humans; Intubation, Intratracheal; Investigative techniques of respiratory function; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Respiration - physiology; Respiratory Function Tests - instrumentation; Respiratory Function Tests - methods; Human; Respiratory disease; Respiratory intensive care; Exploration; Artificial ventilation; Lung function; Treatment; Respiratory failure; Intubation; Technique; Impedance; Respiration; Resuscitation
• ISSN: 0903-1936; 1399-3003
• DOI: 10.1183/09031936.96.09051079

Measurement of respiratory impedance (Zrs) in intubated patients requires corrections for flow-dependent resistance and air compression inside the endotracheal tube (ET). The purpose of this study was to test a new correction technique for these effects. We therefore studied 110 patients in two conditions: breathing normally (C1), or breathing through an ET placed at the mouth (C2). In C1, we measured pressure and flow signals at the mouth, and in C2, at the ET inlet, during application of a pseudorandom forced excitation (4-32 Hz). In C1, respiratory impedance was calculated directly as Z1. In C2, pressure data were first corrected for the flow-dependent resistance of the ET, and respiratory impedance was then corrected both for gas compression inside the set-up and ET inertance (impedance Z2). Strong linear relationships were found between the reference and corrected estimates of the resistance at 6 Hz, the frequency dependence of resistance and the resonant frequency. The mean normalized distance between Z1 and Z2 observed in the patients over the 4-32 Hz frequency range was about 14% for resistance and 12% for reactance (-9% and -4%, respectively, when considering the algebraic value of the distance). This slight underestimation of both components of impedance might be due to an overcorrection of pressure for the flow-dependent resistance of the ET. We conclude that, in intubated patients, newly tested corrections for the mechanical contribution of the endotracheal tube may yield a fair estimate of respiratory impedance when pressure is measured at the inlet of the endotracheal tube.