Nicotine replacement: a new approach to reducing tobacco-related harm

• Published in: The European respiratory journal Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 473 - 479
• Main Authors: Jimenez-Ruiz, C, Kunze, M, Fagerstrom, KO
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Leeds Eur Respiratory Soc 01-02-1998; Maney
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Gingiva; Humans; Medical sciences; Nicotine - administration & dosage; Nicotine - adverse effects; Nicotine - therapeutic use; Plants, Toxic; Smoking Cessation - methods; Tobacco, Smokeless; Tobacco, tobacco smoking; Toxicology; Consumption; Human; Relation; Reduction; Toxicity; Risk factor; Tobacco smoking; Exploration; Poisoning
• ISSN: 0903-1936; 1399-3003
• DOI: 10.1183/09031936.98.11020473

Primary prevention is usually regarded as the most desirable goal in efforts to control tobacco-related diseases. However, this has not been very effective so far; moreover, it would take 30-40 yrs for primary prevention to translate into major health benefits. Modification of tobacco products and/or reduction of tobacco use may also have some impact on tobacco-related diseases. A tobacco dose-dependent risk has been observed in these diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, chronic nonspecific respiratory disorders, and problems during pregnancy. Reduced smoking (smoking fewer cigarettes, leading to a reduced intake of toxic substances) may be indicated in individuals who: 1) are failing in cessation attempts; 2) want to quit but are unable to do so; and 3) do not want to quit but want to reduce smoking. Studies have shown that nicotine replacement medications may be an untapped source in efforts to reduce smoking. Based on Austrian data, it is estimated that, approximately 10 yrs after implementation, a 1% reduction in smoking could save 14 male lung cancer deaths each year, and a 50% reduction would save 700 male lives. Inclusion of females and other tobacco-related diseases suggest that thousands of lives could be saved if smoking could be reduced by 50%. In the European Union, such a reduction in smoking could save > or = 100,000 lives annually. Even a 1% reduction would save 1,000 lives. In conclusion, reduced smoking should be explored as a valid method of reducing tobacco-related harm in those unwilling or unable to quit smoking.