Thigh Ischemia-Reperfusion Model Does Not Accelerate Pulmonary VO2 Kinetics at High Intensity Cycling Exercise

Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of a priming ischemia-reperfusion (IR) model on the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) and cardiopulmonary parameters after high-intensity exercise. Our primary outcome was the overall VO 2 kinetics and secondary outcomes were heart rate (HR) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in physiology Vol. 10
Main Authors: Helal, Lucas, do Nascimento Salvador, Paulo Cesar, de Lucas, Ricardo Dantas, Guglielmo, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A 25-02-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: We aimed to investigate the effect of a priming ischemia-reperfusion (IR) model on the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) and cardiopulmonary parameters after high-intensity exercise. Our primary outcome was the overall VO 2 kinetics and secondary outcomes were heart rate (HR) and O 2 pulse kinetics. We hypothesized that the IR model would accelerate VO 2 and cardiopulmonary kinetics during the exercise. Methods: 10 recreationally active men (25.7 ± 4.7 years; 79.3 ± 10.8 kg; 177 ± 5 cm; 44.5 ± 6.2 mL kg −1 min −1 ) performed a maximal incremental ramp test and four constant load sessions at the midpoint between ventilatory threshold and VO 2 max on separate days: two without IR (CON) and two with IR (IR). The IR model consisted of a thigh bi-lateral occlusion for 15 min at a pressure of 250 mmHg, followed by 3 min off, before high-intensity exercise bouts. Results: There were no significant differences for any VO 2 kinetics parameters (VO 2 base 1.08 ± 0.08 vs. 1.12 ± 0.06 L min −1 ; P = 0.30; τ = 50.1 ± 7.0 vs. 47.9 ± 6.4 s; P = 0.47), as well as for HR (MRT 180s 67.3 ± 6.0 vs. 71.3 ± 6.1 s; P = 0.54) and O 2 pulse kinetics (MRT 180s 40.9 ± 3.9 vs. 48.2 ± 5.6 s; P = 0.31) between IR and CON conditions, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that the priming IR model used in this study had no influence on VO 2 , HR, and O 2 pulse kinetics during high-intensity cycling exercise.
Bibliography:Reviewed by: Joanna E. MacLean, University of Alberta, Canada; Trevor James King, University of Guelph, Canada
This article was submitted to Respiratory Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Physiology
Edited by: Keith Russell Brunt, Dalhousie University, Canada
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2019.00160