SME-supplier alliance activity in manufacturing: contingent benefits and perceptions
We address the following two questions: how upstream vertical alliance (UVA) activity affects the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); and how SME perceptions of that relationship influence the choice to engage in UVA activity. Using responses from a recent survey of business un...
Saved in:
Published in: | Strategic management journal Vol. 27; no. 8; pp. 741 - 763 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01-08-2006
John Wiley and Sons |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We address the following two questions: how upstream vertical alliance (UVA) activity affects the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); and how SME perceptions of that relationship influence the choice to engage in UVA activity. Using responses from a recent survey of business unit managers representing 200 SMEs, we find that UVA activity benefits SME performance when self-selection effects are controlled. Instead of being a source of differentiation advantages, UVA activity leverages the SME's existing advantages. And, while SME perceptions appear to drive the self-selection of UVA activity, those perceptions are inaccurate; the result is that the SMEs likely to benefit less from such activity engage in it more. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:SMJ538 istex:A4B0D98FBABDD7D4B160394BA8C2FE2E8AFAB7EB ark:/67375/WNG-62D90WB2-N ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0143-2095 1097-0266 |
DOI: | 10.1002/smj.538 |