SME-supplier alliance activity in manufacturing: contingent benefits and perceptions

We address the following two questions: how upstream vertical alliance (UVA) activity affects the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); and how SME perceptions of that relationship influence the choice to engage in UVA activity. Using responses from a recent survey of business un...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Strategic management journal Vol. 27; no. 8; pp. 741 - 763
Main Author: Arend, Richard J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-08-2006
John Wiley and Sons
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We address the following two questions: how upstream vertical alliance (UVA) activity affects the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); and how SME perceptions of that relationship influence the choice to engage in UVA activity. Using responses from a recent survey of business unit managers representing 200 SMEs, we find that UVA activity benefits SME performance when self-selection effects are controlled. Instead of being a source of differentiation advantages, UVA activity leverages the SME's existing advantages. And, while SME perceptions appear to drive the self-selection of UVA activity, those perceptions are inaccurate; the result is that the SMEs likely to benefit less from such activity engage in it more.
Bibliography:ArticleID:SMJ538
istex:A4B0D98FBABDD7D4B160394BA8C2FE2E8AFAB7EB
ark:/67375/WNG-62D90WB2-N
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-2095
1097-0266
DOI:10.1002/smj.538