Atrazine and glyphosate dynamics in a lotic ecosystem: the common snapping turtle as a sentinel species

• Published in: Environmental monitoring and assessment Vol. 187; no. 3; pp. 114 - 15
• Main Authors: Douros, Derrick L., Gaines, Karen F., Novak, James M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-03-2015; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Animals; Aquatic habitats; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution; Atrazine; Atrazine - analogs & derivatives; Atrazine - analysis; Atrazine - metabolism; Chelydra serpentina; Contaminants; Drinking water; Earth and Environmental Science; Ecology; Ecosystem; Ecotoxicology; Environment; Environmental Management; Environmental Monitoring; Glycine - analogs & derivatives; Glycine - analysis; Glycine - metabolism; Glyphosate; Habitats; Herbicides; Illinois; Indicator species; Laboratories; Lakes; Metabolites; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis; Morphology; Pesticides; Pesticides - analysis; Pesticides - metabolism; Reptiles & amphibians; Rivers; Runoff; Tissues; Turtles; Turtles - metabolism; Water analysis; Water column; Water quality; Water sampling; USA, Illinois; DACT; Pesticide; Snapping turtle; Glyphosate; Atrazine
• ISSN: 0167-6369; 1573-2959
• DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4336-6

Atrazine and glyphosate are two of the most common pesticides used in the US Midwest that impact water quality via runoff, and the common snapping turtle (
Chelydra serpentina
) is an excellent indicator species to monitor these pesticides especially in lotic systems. The goals of this study were to (1) quantify atrazine, the atrazine metabolite diaminochlorotriazine (DACT), and glyphosate burdens in common snapping turtle tissue from individuals collected within the Embarras River in Illinois; (2) quantify atrazine, DACT, and glyphosate loads in water from the aquatic habitats in which common snapping turtles reside; and (3) investigate tissue loads based on turtle morphology and habitat choice. Concentrations of atrazine, DACT, and glyphosate in tissue did not show any relationship with lake habitat, carapace length, width, or mass. Both atrazine and glyphosate tissue samples varied as a function of site (river vs. lake), but DACT did not. Atrazine and glyphosate concentrations in water samples showed a linear effect on distance from the reservoir spillway and a deviation from linearity. Water column concentrations of all three contaminants varied across capture sites, but atrazine water concentration did not influence DACT water concentration nor did it exhibit a site interaction. Water atrazine and glyphosate concentrations were greater than tissue concentrations, whereas DACT water and tissue concentrations did not differ. This study showed that turtles are useful in long-term pesticide monitoring, and because DACT as a metabolite is less sensitive to variation, it should be considered as a preferred biomarker for pesticide runoff.