Structural properties and prebiotic activities of fractionated lotus seed resistant starches
•Two main LRS3 fractions were separated by an alkali-ethanol system.•The fractions varied in structure shown by HPSEC-MALLS-RI, ESEM, XRD, FT-IR and NMR.•LRS3-20% displayed a stronger prebiotic activity compared to LRS3-30% and HAMS.•LRS’s prebiotic activity was related to its rough surface and doub...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food chemistry Vol. 251; pp. 33 - 40 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Elsevier Ltd
15-06-2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Two main LRS3 fractions were separated by an alkali-ethanol system.•The fractions varied in structure shown by HPSEC-MALLS-RI, ESEM, XRD, FT-IR and NMR.•LRS3-20% displayed a stronger prebiotic activity compared to LRS3-30% and HAMS.•LRS’s prebiotic activity was related to its rough surface and double helix structure.
The objective of this study was to fractionate lotus seed resistant starch (LRS3) and investigate their structural properties and prebiotic activities. Two main fractions of resistant starch precipitated gradually by ethanol at concentrations of 20% and 30% were named as LRS3-20% and LRS3-30%, respectively. The swelling power and solubility of LRS3-20% were smaller compared to LRS3-30%, and their moisture and resistant starch contents were not significantly different. LRS3-20% and LRS3-30% had molecular weights mainly of 2.0 × 104–4.0 × 104 and 1.0 × 104–2.0 × 104 g/mol. Layered strips and gully shapes were evident on the rough surfaces of LRS3-20%, while LRS3-30% displayed a relatively smooth surface. Both LRS3-20% and LRS3-30% had a B-type crystalline structure with LRS3-20% containing more ordered structures and double-helices. Furthermore, LRS3-20% displayed higher prebiotic activities against Bifidobacterium adolescentis and Lactobacillus acidophilus compared to LRS3-30% and high amylose maize starch. This effect was related to its rough surface and double helix structure. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0308-8146 1873-7072 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.057 |