Preference for and reinforcing efficacy of different types of attention in preschool children
It is unknown whether and to what extent common types of attention delivered in early childhood environments are preferred by and function as reinforcers for young children. We assessed children's preference for commonly delivered types of attention across 31 preschool‐aged participants (Experi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied behavior analysis Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 882 - 902 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hoboken, USA
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-06-2021
Wiley Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | It is unknown whether and to what extent common types of attention delivered in early childhood environments are preferred by and function as reinforcers for young children. We assessed children's preference for commonly delivered types of attention across 31 preschool‐aged participants (Experiment 1). Next, we conducted a reinforcer assessment (Experiment 2) and a progressive‐ratio assessment (Experiment 3) to (a) validate the results of the preference assessment and (b) determine the relative reinforcing efficacy of each type of attention. Results of Experiment 1 showed that most participants preferred conversation or physical interaction. Results of Experiment 2 validated the results of Experiment 1 showing preferred types of attention were more likely to function as reinforcers. Finally, although some types of attention functioned as reinforcers, results of Experiment 3 indicated these reinforcers only maintained responding under relatively dense schedules of reinforcement. Clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | This study is based on the dissertation submitted by the first author under the supervision of the second author to the Department of Applied Behavioral Science at the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the doctoral degree. We would like to thank Drs. Pamela Neidert, Derek Reed, Jan Sheldon, and Eva Horn for their input on an earlier version of this manuscript. Amy M. Harper is now at Building Bridges Therapy Center. Erica S. Jowett Hirst is now at Innovative Behavioral Solutions, PLLC. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0021-8855 1938-3703 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jaba.814 |