Negative evaluation of conservation agriculture: perspectives from African smallholder farmers

• Published in: International journal of agricultural sustainability Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 467 - 481
• Main Authors: Brown, Brendan, Nuberg, Ian, Llewellyn, Rick
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Taylor & Francis 04-07-2017; Taylor & Francis Ltd; Taylor & Francis Group
• Subjects: adoption gap; Africa; Agricultural conservation; Agriculture; Conservation; conservation agriculture; Evaluation; Farming; farming systems research; Farms; Feasibility studies; Institutional constraints; Promotion; Qualitative assessment; technology adoption
• ISSN: 1473-5903; 1747-762X
• DOI: 10.1080/14735903.2017.1336051

Despite more than three decades of promotion, conservation agriculture (CA) has not been widely adopted by smallholder farmer in sub-Saharan Africa. This low rate of adoption reflects substantial negative evaluation of CA by many smallholder farmers, the causes of which have not been adequately explored in an in-depth, qualitative manner. Hence, we implement the Livelihoods Platforms Approach to explore directly with negatively evaluating farmers the reasons why they chose not to implement CA using semi-structured interviews with 35 farmers from 23 communities in 6 African countries. While there are issues with perceived benefit and relevance, the primary driver of negative evaluation of CA was found to be the feasibility of implementation. The required resources to implement CA (financial, physical, human and informational) are limited by community and institutional constraints which appear unlikely to be overcome through interventions targeted at addressing household resources. More positive evaluation of CA by smallholder farmers requires: (1) development of financially viable CA adoption pathways; (2) incorporation of wider livelihood objectives into a CA 'package'; (3) re-evaluation of current extension policy; and (4) development of CA-complementary agricultural policies. Without addressing these issues, the potential benefits of CA adoption are unlikely to be achieved in African smallholder systems.