Academic Future of Interventional Radiology Subspecialty: Are We Giving Enough Space to Radiology Trainees?

Background The aim of this study was to investigate willingness and barriers to academic activities of radiology trainees interested in interventional radiology subspecialty. Materials and methods Radiology trainees and fellows were called to participate a 35-question survey via online platforms and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical science educator Vol. 33; no. 1; pp. 173 - 183
Main Authors: Bold, Bayarbaatar, Mishig, Anudari, Dashjamts, Tuvshinjargal, Shelmerdine, Susan, Choa-Go, Joanna Marie, Serra, Maria Mercedes, Udare, Ashlesha, Radikė, Monika, Vernuccio, Federica
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York Springer US 01-02-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The aim of this study was to investigate willingness and barriers to academic activities of radiology trainees interested in interventional radiology subspecialty. Materials and methods Radiology trainees and fellows were called to participate a 35-question survey via online platforms and radiological societies. The research survey investigated on involvement in academic activities, willingness of a future academic career, and challenges for pursuing an academic career. Research participants interested in interventional radiology were selected for analysis. Analyses were performed by using either Fisher’s exact or chi-square tests. Results Of 892 respondents to the survey, 155 (17.4%) (112/155, 72.3% men and 43/155, 27.7% women) declared interest in interventional radiology. Active involvement in research and teaching was reported by 53.5% (83/155) and 30.3% (47/155) of the participants, respectively. The majority is willing to work in an academic setting in the future (66.8%, 103/155) and to perform a research fellowship abroad (83.9%, 130/155). Insufficient time was the greatest perceived barrier for both research and teaching activities (49.0% [76/155] and 48.4% [75/155], respectively), followed by lack of mentorship (49.0% [75/155] and 35.5% [55/155], respectively) and lack of support from faculty (40.3% [62/155] and 37.4% [58/155], respectively). Conclusion Our international study shows that most trainees interested in interventional radiology subspecialty actively participate in research activities and plan to work in an academic setting. However, insufficient time for academia, mentorship, and support from seniors are considered challenges in pursuing an academic career.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2156-8650
2156-8650
DOI:10.1007/s40670-023-01733-y