Long-term prognostic value of changes in left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

• Published in: Heart and vessels Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 645 - 652
• Main Authors: Sakaguchi, Eirin, Yamada, Akira, Naruse, Hiroyuki, Hattori, Hidekazu, Nishimura, Hideto, Kawai, Hideki, Muramatsu, Takashi, Ishii, Junnichi, Hata, Tadayoshi, Saito, Kuniaki, Izawa, Hideo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Tokyo Springer Japan 01-05-2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Aged; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Cardiac Surgery; Cardiology; Congestive heart failure; Echocardiography; Ejection fraction; Global Longitudinal Strain; Heart failure; Heart Failure - complications; Heart Failure - diagnostic imaging; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Prognosis; Regression analysis; Stroke Volume; Vascular Surgery; Ventricle; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Long-term prognosis; Global longitudinal strain; Risk stratification
• ISSN: 0910-8327; 1615-2573
• DOI: 10.1007/s00380-022-02211-y

Background
Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) has emerged as a more sensitive index than LV ejection fraction (LVEF) for detecting subclinical LV dysfunction. We examined whether changes in GLS values are associated with the long-term prognosis of patients with a preserved LVEF and acute decompensated heart failure (HF).
Methods
We studied 100 consecutive patients (mean age: 71 years) who were hospitalized for HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and had a preserved LVEF (≥ 50%) in both the acute and stable phases. We performed two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in the acute (GLS-acute) and stable (GLS-stable) phases at a median of 2 and 347 days after admission, respectively, and calculated the rate of change of the absolute value of GLS-stable with respect to that of GLS-acute. An improved GLS was defined as a rate of change in GLS ≥ 16%, and a non-improved GLS was a rate of change < 16%. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (MACE).
Results
During a mean follow-up period of 1218 days, MACE occurred in 26 patients, including 8 all-cause deaths and 18 readmissions for HF. The rate of change in GLS for patients with MACE was lower than compared to those without MACE (10.6% vs 26.0%,
p
 < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated the rate of change in GLS was an independent predictor of MACE (
p
 < 0.001). A non-improved GLS was correlated with a high risk of MACE.
Conclusion
Changes in GLS values could be useful for the long-term risk stratification of patients hospitalized for HFpEF and persistently preserved LVEF.