Randomized comparison between 2-link cell design biolimus A9-eluting stent and 3-link cell design everolimus-eluting stent in patients with de novo true coronary bifurcation lesions: the BEGIN trial

The appropriate stent platform for treating coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) remains controversial. Previous bench tests have demonstrated the superiority of a 2-link cell design to 3-link cell design for creating inter-strut dilation at the side branch ostium. This randomized multicenter prospec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heart and vessels Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 1297 - 1308
Main Authors: Yamawaki, Masahiro, Muramatsu, Toshiya, Ashida, Kazuhiro, Kishi, Koichi, Morino, Yoshihiro, Kinoshita, Yoshihisa, Fujii, Takashi, Noguchi, Yuichi, Hosogi, Shingo, Kawai, Kazuya, Hibi, Kiyoshi, Shibata, Yoshisato, Ohira, Hiroshi, Morita, Yasuhiro, Tarutani, Yasuhiro, Toda, Mikihito, Shimada, Yoshihisa, Ikari, Yuji, Ando, Jiro, Hikichi, Yutaka, Otsuka, Yoritaka, Fuku, Yasushi, Ito, Shigenori, Katoh, Harumi, Kadota, Kazushige, Ito, Yoshiaki, Mitsudo, Kazuaki
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Tokyo Springer Japan 01-08-2019
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The appropriate stent platform for treating coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) remains controversial. Previous bench tests have demonstrated the superiority of a 2-link cell design to 3-link cell design for creating inter-strut dilation at the side branch ostium. This randomized multicenter prospective BEGIN trial compared the biodegradable polymer-based biolimus A9-eluting stent (2-link BES) with the durable polymer-based cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (3-link EES) in 226 patients with de novo CBLs. Patients with true bifurcations, defined as > 50% stenosis in the main vessel and side branch (SB) and an SB diameter > 2.25 mm, were enrolled. Guide wire re-crossing to the distal cell (near the carina) in the jailed SB and final kissing inflation were recommended. The SB angiographic endpoint was < 50% stenosis diameter. Left-main CBLs (13.5% vs. 13.0%) and 2-stent technique (30.6% vs. 22.6%) rates were similar. The primary endpoints (minimum lumen diameter at the SB ostium measured at an independent core laboratory at the 8-month follow-up) were comparable (1.64 ± 0.50 mm vs. 1.63 ± 0.51 mm, p  = 0.976). There was no significant difference in composite outcomes of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vascular revascularization at 12 months (7.4% vs. 8.0%, p  = 0.894). Two-link BES and 3-link EES showed similar 8-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes for true CBLs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0910-8327
1615-2573
DOI:10.1007/s00380-019-01368-3