Evidence for two attentional mechanisms during learning

• Published in: Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) Vol. 74; no. 12; pp. 2112 - 2123
• Main Authors: Torrents-Rodas, David, Koenig, Stephan, Uengoer, Metin, Lachnit, Harald
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-12-2021; Sage Publications Ltd
• Subjects: Executive function; Eye movements; Learning; eye-tracking; associative learning; discrimination learning; Attention; partial reinforcement
• ISSN: 1747-0218; 1747-0226
• DOI: 10.1177/17470218211019308

We sought to provide evidence for a combined effect of two attentional mechanisms during associative learning. Participants’ eye movements were recorded as they predicted the outcomes following different pairs of cues. Across the trials of an initial stage, a relevant cue in each pair was consistently followed by one of two outcomes, while an irrelevant cue was equally followed by either of them. Thus, the relevant cue should have been associated with small relative prediction errors, compared to the irrelevant cue. In a later stage, each pair came to be followed by one outcome on a random half of the trials and by the other outcome on the remaining half, and thus there should have been a rise in the overall prediction error. Consistent with an attentional mechanism based on relative prediction error, an attentional advantage for the relevant cue was evident in the first stage. However, in accordance with a mechanism linked to overall prediction error, the attention paid to both types of cues increased at the beginning of the second stage. These results showed up in both dwell times and within-trial patterns of fixations, and they were predicted by a hybrid model of attention.