Influence of preoperative chemotherapy-induced leukopenia on survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: exploratory analysis of JCOG9907

Background The relationship between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia (CIL) and survival has not been investigated in patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We analyzed the association of CIL with survival outcomes using data from JCOG9907 on the e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 41 - 48
Main Authors: Hara, Hiroki, Mizusawa, Junki, Hironaka, Shuichi, Kato, Ken, Daiko, Hiroyuki, Abe, Tetsuya, Nakamura, Kenichi, Ando, Nobutoshi, Kitagawa, Yuko
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Singapore Springer Singapore 2021
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background The relationship between chemotherapy-induced leukopenia (CIL) and survival has not been investigated in patients undergoing preoperative chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We analyzed the association of CIL with survival outcomes using data from JCOG9907 on the efficacy of preoperative chemotherapy for stage II/III ESCC. Methods Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two courses of 5-FU (800 mg/m 2 days 1–5) and cisplatin (80 mg/m 2 day 1) repeated every 3 weeks. Patients in the preoperative chemotherapy arm receiving at least one course of chemotherapy and undergoing subsequent surgery in JCOG9907 were divided into two subgroups: CIL ( +), those with grade 2–4 leukopenia at least once during preoperative chemotherapy; and CIL (−), those with grades 0–1. The association of CIL with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed. Results Among 164 patients enrolled in JCOG9907, 152 patients were included in this analysis, 52 in CIL ( +) and 100 patients in CIL (−) subgroups. The 3-year OS for CIL ( +) was inferior to that for CIL (−) (48.1% vs. 73.9%); hazard ratio (HR) = 1.94 (95% CI 1.18–3.16, P  < .01). For 3-year PFS, a similar tendency was observed (44.2% vs. 55.8%; HR = 1.38 (95% CI 0.88–2.17, P  = .16). Multivariable analysis revealed that CIL was not an independent factor for OS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.63–2.07, P  = .67). Conclusion We showed that CIL during preoperative chemotherapy might not be a prognostic factor in patients with ESCC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1612-9059
1612-9067
DOI:10.1007/s10388-020-00752-7