Structural Studies on Pax-8 Prd Domain/DNA Complex

• Published in: Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics Vol. 24; no. 5; pp. 429 - 441
• Main Authors: Campagnolo, Mara, Pesaresi, Alessandro, Zelezetsky, Igor, Geremia, Silvano, Randaccio, Lucio, Bisca, Alessia, Tell, Gianluca
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis Group 01-04-2007
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Binding Sites; Crystallography, X-Ray; DNA - chemistry; DNA - metabolism; DNA-Binding Proteins - chemistry; Helix-Turn-Helix Motifs; Humans; Models, Molecular; Molecular Sequence Data; Nucleic Acid Conformation; Nucleic Acid Heteroduplexes; Paired Box Transcription Factors - chemistry; Paired Box Transcription Factors - metabolism; PAX8 Transcription Factor; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Protein Binding; Protein Conformation
• ISSN: 0739-1102; 1538-0254
• DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2007.10507131

Pax-8 is a member of the Pax family of transcription factors and is essential in the development of thyroid follicular cells. Pax-8 has two DNA-binding domains: the paired domain and the homeo domain. In this study, a preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the mammalian Pax-8 paired domain in complex with the C-site of the thyroglobulin promoter was achieved. The Pax-8 paired domain was crystallized by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method in complex with both a blunt-ended 26 bp DNA fragment and with a sticky-ended 24 bp DNA fragment with two additional overhanging bases. Crystallization experiments make clear that the growth of transparent crystals with large dimensions and regular shape is particularly influenced by ionic strength. The crystals of Pax-8 complex with blunt-ended and sticky-ended DNA, diffracted synchrotron radiation to 6.0 and 8.0 Å resolution and belongs both to the C centered monoclinic system with cell dimensions: a = 89.88 Å, b = 80.05 Å, c = 67.73 Å, and β = 124.3° and a = 256.56, b = 69.07, c = 99.32 Å, and β = 98.1°, respectively. Fluorescence experiments suggest that the crystalline disorder, deduced by the poor diffraction, can be attributed to the low homogeneity of the protein-DNA sample. The theoretical comparative model of the Pax-8 paired domain complexed with the C-site of the thyroglobulin promoter shows the probable presence of some specific protein-DNA interactions already observed in other Pax proteins and the important role of the cysteine residues of PAI subdomain in the redox control of the DNA recognition.