Evolution of Main Water Cycle Fluxes in the Karst Mountain Region of Southwest China

• Published in: Water (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 8; p. 2262
• Main Authors: Liu, Huan, Jia, Yangwen, Niu, Cunwen, Hu, Peng, Du, Junkai, Su, Huidong, Zeng, Qinghui
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01-08-2020
• Subjects: Agricultural production; Annual precipitation; Aquifers; Basins; Climate change; Computer simulation; Emission analysis; Energy transfer; Environmental aspects; Evapotranspiration; Fluxes; Freshwater resources; Geology; Hydrogeology; Hydrologic cycle; Hydrologic models; hydrological model; Hydrology; Karst; karst mountain; Land area; Mountains; Observations; Porous media; Precipitation; Regions; River flow; River networks; Rivers; Runoff; Simulation; southwest China; Spatial variations; Topography; Transpiration; Vegetation; water cycle fluxes; Water depth; Water resources; Water shortages; Water supply; Watersheds; China
• ISSN: 2073-4441; 2073-4441
• DOI: 10.3390/w12082262

Distributed hydrological simulation in karst regions has always been a challenging task because of their unique hydrogeological characteristics. The karst mountain region of southwest China (KMRSC), one of the largest continuous karst areas in the world, contributes to about 54 percent of water supply in the basins. In spite of its importance, we have a poor understanding of the evolution laws of hydrological cycle and water resources in KMRSC. We developed a physically-based, distributed hydrological model, called Water and Energy transfer Processes (WEP)-karst model, for KMRSC by introducing the equivalent porous medium approach to the WEP-L model, and dividing the modelling domain into 2021 sub-watersheds. The area of sub-watersheds ranges from 55 to 920 km2, with an average value of 170 km2. The model showed a good performance in simulating the monthly discharge at 18 representative hydrological stations, with the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) values ranging from 0.71 to 0.94, and the relative error (RE) values from −9.8% to 8.3% during the validation period (1980–2000). Then, we employed an in-depth analysis of the temporal and spatial variation of main water cycle fluxes, including precipitation, infiltration, evapotranspiration, blue water (i.e., river runoff), and green water (i.e., vegetation transpiration) over 1956–2015. In addition, the impact of climate change on these fluxes was evaluated under the median emission scenario (RCP4.5). The results showed that: (1) annual average precipitation of KMRSC reached 1506 mm, which is 2.4 times of the national average level, and about 47% (701 mm) of it contributed to river runoff. The infiltration and evapotranspiration were 862 and 870 mm, respectively. The transpiration from plants and trees accounted for 51% of the evapotranspiration. (2) Except for the green water, other fluxes experienced a significant decrease over the past 60 years. Blue water showed the largest interannual fluctuation and the strongest sensitivity to climate change. (3) Both precipitation and infiltration concentrated from May to August, and blue water increased notably from May to June and peaked in June. Blue water and precipitation were more likely to decrease in the future over 2021–2050 due to the climate change.