A Glass Ceiling in Orthopedic Surgery: Publication Trends by Gender

• Published in: Orthopedics (Thorofare, N.J.) Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. e118 - 7
• Main Authors: Johnson, Mitchell A, Weber, Kristy L, Parambath, Andrew, Shah, Neal, Dardas, Agnes Z, Ronen, Shelly, Shah, Apurva S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Slack, Inc 01-03-2023; SLACK INCORPORATED
• Subjects: Ankle; Author productivity; Bone surgery; Databases, Factual; Demographic aspects; Female; Female-male relations; Gender; Humans; Impact factors; Investigations; Joint surgery; Journal Impact Factor; Male; Medical publishing; Orthopedic Procedures; Orthopedic surgery; Orthopedics; Otolaryngology; Pediatrics; Sex discrimination; Sports medicine; Statistics; Surgery, Experimental; Surgical research; Thoracic surgery; United States
• ISSN: 0147-7447; 1938-2367
• DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20221024-05

Women are underrepresented across the field of orthopedic surgery and may face barriers to academic advancement. Research presentation at national meetings and publication record are important drivers of advancement in academic orthopedic surgery. However, little is known regarding potential gender differences in publication after orthopedic conference research presentation. This investigation analyzed research presentations at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons in 2016 and 2017. Author gender was determined through a search of institutional and professional networking websites for gender-specific pronouns. Resulting publications were identified using a systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases. A total of 1696 of 1803 (94.1%) abstracts from 2016 to 2017 had identifiable gender for both the first and last authors, with 1213 (71.5%) abstracts ultimately being published. There were no differences in average sample size or level of evidence between genders. Abstracts authored by women were significantly less likely to lead to publication compared with those by men (67.1% vs 72.1%,
=.023), with articles authored by women having a longer median time to publication (median, 20 months [interquartile range, 19] vs 17 months [interquartile range, 15];
=.003). This discrepancy was most apparent in adult reconstruction, with women having a 15.5% lower rate of publication (55.1% [27/49] vs 70.6% [307/435];
=.026) and lower publication journal impact factor (2.7±1.4 vs 3.4±3.4,
=.040) than men. Potential reasons for these discrepancies, including disproportionate domestic obligations, inadequate mentorship, and bias against female researchers, should be addressed. [
. 2023;46(2):e118-e124.].