Mirabegron and antimuscarinics for treating ureteral stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron (50 mg/day) and antimuscarinics in treating ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs). Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Libra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in pharmacology Vol. 14; p. 1266636
Main Authors: Lu, Youyi, Li, Qi, Zou, Qingsong, Cui, Yuanshan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A 18-10-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron (50 mg/day) and antimuscarinics in treating ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs). Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The RevMan version 5.3.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: This meta-analysis included five RCTs involving 317 patients. A fixed effects model revealed that mirabegron was superior to antimuscarinics in treating urinary symptoms (MD −1.39, 95% CI −2.63 to −0.15, p = 0.03) and general health (MD −1.65, 95% CI −2.60 to −0.69, p = 0.0007) 1 week after treatment initiation. We observed no significant differences in body pain (MD 0.05, 95% CI −1.06 to 1.15, p = 0.94), work performance (MD −0.86, 95% CI −1.77 to 0.06, p = 0.07), and sexual matters (MD 0.03, 95% CI −0.77 to 0.83, p = 0.94). Two weeks after treatment initiation, the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) revealed no significant differences between the two groups. The mirabegron group demonstrated a significant improvement in the quality of life (QoL) (MD −0.18, 95% CI −0.34 to −0.01, p = 0.03), while the International Prostate Symptom Score did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups (MD −0.74, 95% CI −1.79 to 0.32, p = 0.17). Regarding safety, a pooled data analysis presented that the incidence of constipation was lower in the mirabegron group (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.77, p = 0.03). The mirabegron and antimuscarinics groups did not differ significantly concerning the risk of dry mouth (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.27, p = 0.08). Conclusion: Mirabegron is superior to antimuscarinics in alleviating ureteral SRSs and improving QoL. Additionally, mirabegron 50 mg/day presented safety with a lower incidence of constipation.
Bibliography:content type line 23
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
Edited by: Marianne Leitsmann (Schmid), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
Panagiotis Mourmouris, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Reviewed by: Lukas Scheipner, Medical University of Graz, Austria
ISSN:1663-9812
1663-9812
DOI:10.3389/fphar.2023.1266636