Mirabegron and antimuscarinics for treating ureteral stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
Objective: We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron (50 mg/day) and antimuscarinics in treating ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs). Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Libra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in pharmacology Vol. 14; p. 1266636 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A
18-10-2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective:
We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron (50 mg/day) and antimuscarinics in treating ureteral stent-related symptoms (SRSs).
Methods:
All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The RevMan version 5.3.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
Results:
This meta-analysis included five RCTs involving 317 patients. A fixed effects model revealed that mirabegron was superior to antimuscarinics in treating urinary symptoms (MD −1.39, 95% CI −2.63 to −0.15,
p
= 0.03) and general health (MD −1.65, 95% CI −2.60 to −0.69,
p
= 0.0007) 1 week after treatment initiation. We observed no significant differences in body pain (MD 0.05, 95% CI −1.06 to 1.15,
p
= 0.94), work performance (MD −0.86, 95% CI −1.77 to 0.06,
p
= 0.07), and sexual matters (MD 0.03, 95% CI −0.77 to 0.83,
p
= 0.94). Two weeks after treatment initiation, the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) revealed no significant differences between the two groups. The mirabegron group demonstrated a significant improvement in the quality of life (QoL) (MD −0.18, 95% CI −0.34 to −0.01,
p
= 0.03), while the International Prostate Symptom Score did not reveal a significant difference between the two groups (MD −0.74, 95% CI −1.79 to 0.32,
p
= 0.17). Regarding safety, a pooled data analysis presented that the incidence of constipation was lower in the mirabegron group (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.77,
p
= 0.03). The mirabegron and antimuscarinics groups did not differ significantly concerning the risk of dry mouth (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.27,
p
= 0.08).
Conclusion:
Mirabegron is superior to antimuscarinics in alleviating ureteral SRSs and improving QoL. Additionally, mirabegron 50 mg/day presented safety with a lower incidence of constipation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | content type line 23 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 Edited by: Marianne Leitsmann (Schmid), University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany Panagiotis Mourmouris, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship Reviewed by: Lukas Scheipner, Medical University of Graz, Austria |
ISSN: | 1663-9812 1663-9812 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fphar.2023.1266636 |