Endoscopic anti-reflux therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease
Gastroesophageal reflux disease has an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. A significant proportion of patients have a suboptimal response to proton pump inhibitors or are unwilling to take lifelong medication due to concerns about long-term adverse effects. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapi...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 27; no. 39; pp. 6601 - 6614 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
21-10-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Gastroesophageal reflux disease has an increasing incidence and prevalence worldwide. A significant proportion of patients have a suboptimal response to proton pump inhibitors or are unwilling to take lifelong medication due to concerns about long-term adverse effects. Endoscopic anti-reflux therapies offer a minimally invasive option for patients unwilling to undergo surgical treatment or take lifelong medication. The best candidates are those with a good response to proton pump inhibitors and without a significant sliding hiatal hernia. Transoral incisionless fundoplication and nonablative radiofrequency are the techniques with the largest body of evidence and that have been tested in several randomized clinical trials. Band-assisted ligation techniques, anti-reflux mucosectomy, anti-reflux mucosal ablation, and new plication devices have yielded promising results in recent noncontrolled studies. Nonetheless, the role of endoscopic procedures remains controversial due to limited long-term and comparative data, and no consensus exists in current clinical guidelines. This review provides an updated summary focused on the patient selection, technical details, clinical success, and safety of current and future endoscopic anti-reflux techniques. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Author contributions: Rodriguez de Santiago E and Lorenzo-Zuñiga V designed the research study; all authors performed the literature review; Rodriguez de Santiago E drafted the first version of the manuscript; Estremera-Arevalo F, Lorenzo-Zuñiga V, Albeniz E, and Teruel Sanchez-Vegazo C critically reviewed the manuscript; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Corresponding author: Enrique Rodríguez de Santiago, MD, MHSc, PhD, Consultant Physician-Scientist, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Ctra. de Colmenar Viejo km. 9100, Madrid 28034, Spain. enrodesan@gmail.com |
ISSN: | 1007-9327 2219-2840 |
DOI: | 10.3748/wjg.v27.i39.6601 |