Serum outperforms plasma in small extracellular vesicle microRNA biomarker studies of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential biomarkers for many diseases. However, they can originate from non-disease specific sources, such as blood cells, and compromise the investigations for miRNA biomarkers. While small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) have been suggested to provide a purer sour...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of gastroenterology : WJG Vol. 26; no. 20; pp. 2570 - 2583
Main Authors: Chiam, Karen, Mayne, George C, Wang, Tingting, Watson, David I, Irvine, Tanya S, Bright, Tim, Smith, Lorelle T, Ball, Imogen A, Bowen, Joanne M, Keefe, Dorothy M, Thompson, Sarah K, Hussey, Damian J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 28-05-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are potential biomarkers for many diseases. However, they can originate from non-disease specific sources, such as blood cells, and compromise the investigations for miRNA biomarkers. While small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) have been suggested to provide a purer source of circulating miRNAs for biomarkers discovery, the most suitable blood sample for sEV miRNA biomarker studies has not been defined. To compare the miRNA profiles between matched serum and plasma sEV preparations to determine their suitability for biomarker studies. Matched serum and plasma samples were obtained from 10 healthy controls and 10 patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. sEV isolates were prepared from serum and plasma using ExoQuick and quantified using NanoSight. RNA was extracted from sEV preparations with the miRNeasy Serum/Plasma kit and profiled using the Taqman Openarray qPCR. The overall miRNA content and the expression of specific miRNAs of reported vesicular and non-vesicular origins were compared between serum and plasma sEV preparations. The diagnostic performance of a previously identified multi-miRNA biomarker panel for esophageal adenocarcinoma was also compared. The overall miRNA content was higher in plasma sEV preparations (480 miRNAs) and contained 97.5% of the miRNAs found in the serum sEV preparations (412 miRNAs).The expression of commonly expressed miRNAs was highly correlated (Spearman's R = 0.87, < 0.0001) between the plasma and serum sEV preparations, but was consistently higher in the plasma sEV preparations. Specific blood-cell miRNAs (hsa-miR-223-3p, hsa-miR-451a, miR-19b-3p, hsa-miR-17-5p, hsa-miR-30b-5p, hsa-miR-106a-5p, hsa-miR-150-5p and hsa-miR-92a-3p) were expressed at 2.7 to 9.6 fold higher levels in the plasma sEV preparations compared to serum sEV preparations ( < 0.05). In plasma sEV preparations, the percentage of protein-associated miRNAs expressed at relatively higher levels (Ct 20-25) was greater than serum sEV preparations (50% 31%). While the percentage of vesicle-associated miRNAs expressed at relatively higher levels was greater in the serum sEV preparations than plasma sEV preparations (70% 44%). A 5-miRNA biomarker panel produced a higher cross validated accuracy for discriminating patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma from healthy controls using serum sEV preparations compared with plasma sEV preparations (AUROC 0.80 0.54, < 0.05). Although plasma sEV preparations contained more miRNAs than serum sEV preparations, they also contained more miRNAs from non-vesicle origins. Serum appears to be more suitable than plasma for sEV miRNAs biomarkers studies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Corresponding author: Damian J Hussey, PhD, Senior Scientist, Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia. damian.hussey@flinders.edu.au
Supported by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Project Funding, No. APP1104281; and NHMRC Centres of Research Excellence (CRE) Grant, No. APP1040947.
Author contributions: Hussey DJ conceived and supervised the study; Chiam K, Mayne GC, Watson DI, Bowen JM, Keefe DM, Thompson SK and Hussey DJ contributed to study design; Watson DI, Irvine TS, Bright T, Smith LT and White I collected patient blood samples; Wang T processed patient blood samples and performed the laboratory assays; Chiam K, Mayne GC and Hussey DJ analysed the data; Chiam K wrote the first draft of the paper; All authors contributed to revision of the manuscript in its final version.
ISSN:1007-9327
2219-2840
DOI:10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2570