Estimation of hepatic fat fraction using modified Dixon magnetic resonance imaging techniques: effect of liver cirrhosis

To evaluate modified Dixon MRI techniques in hepatic fat estimation and to assess the effect of cirrhosis. 235 patients who underwent liver MRI were included. Correlation between modified Dixon techniques with MRS was assessed. Accuracy of MR techniques in hepatic fat estimation was calculated, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical imaging Vol. 51; pp. 50 - 58
Main Authors: Min, Jeeyoung, Park, Hee Sun, Kim, Young Jun, Yu, Mi Hye, Jung, Sung Il, Jeon, Hae Jeong
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-09-2018
Elsevier Limited
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To evaluate modified Dixon MRI techniques in hepatic fat estimation and to assess the effect of cirrhosis. 235 patients who underwent liver MRI were included. Correlation between modified Dixon techniques with MRS was assessed. Accuracy of MR techniques in hepatic fat estimation was calculated, and the result was compared between patients with/without liver cirrhosis. Correlation between modified Dixon and MRS was better in group without liver cirrhosis, and accuracy of modified Dixon method was higher in group without liver cirrhosis. Modified Dixon techniques estimate hepatic fat fraction noninvasively, but the result can be influenced by the presence of liver cirrhosis. •Modified Dixon techniques and MRS showed strong positive correlation in all patients in hepatic fat quantification.•In hepatic fat quantification, correlation between dual-echo Dixon and MRS was better in the absence of liver cirrhosis than in those with liver cirrhosis.•Accuracy of modified Dixon techniques in hepatic fat estimation was higher in group without liver cirrhosis than in those with liver cirrhosis.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0899-7071
1873-4499
DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.02.002