Oil price volatility predictability: New evidence from a scaled PCA approach

We introduce the scaled principal component analysis (sPCA) method to forecast oil volatility, and compare it with two commonly used dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS). By combining the simple autoregressive model with the three dimen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy economics Vol. 105; p. 105714
Main Authors: Guo, Yangli, He, Feng, Liang, Chao, Ma, Feng
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Kidlington Elsevier B.V 01-01-2022
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We introduce the scaled principal component analysis (sPCA) method to forecast oil volatility, and compare it with two commonly used dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS). By combining the simple autoregressive model with the three dimensionality reduction methods, we obtain several interesting and notable findings. First, the model with the sPCA diffusion index performs substantially better than the competing models based on the out-of-sample Roos2 test. Moreover, the model with the sPCA diffusion index consistently demonstrates superior forecasting power compared with the other models under different macroeconomic conditions (e.g., business cycle recessions and expansions, high- and low-volatility levels, and the COVID-19 pandemic). Furthermore, the findings of our study are strongly robust to various robustness tests, such as alternative forecasting window sizes and different lags of model selection. •We introduce the sPCA method to forecast oil volatility, and compare it with PCA and PLS.•The model with the sPCA diffusion index performs substantially better than the competing models.•The model with the sPCA diffusion index exhibits superior performance under different macroeconomic conditions.•The findings are strongly robust to various robustness tests, such as different windows and lags selection.
ISSN:0140-9883
1873-6181
DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105714