Acceptance of illicit drug use in the Netherlands and Norway: A cross-national survey

Aim: This study aims to explore differences between Dutch and Norwegian adults in the acceptance of illicit drug use in relation to the normalization thesis. Methods: Data were collected in November 2008. In total, 2150 Norwegian and 5616 Dutch respondents were included and the samples were weighted...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Drugs : education, prevention & policy Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 397 - 405
Main Authors: van der Sar, R., Ødegård, E., Rise, J., Brouwers, E. P. M., van de Goor, L. A. M., Garretsen, H. F. L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Informa UK, Ltd 01-10-2012
Taylor & Francis
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim: This study aims to explore differences between Dutch and Norwegian adults in the acceptance of illicit drug use in relation to the normalization thesis. Methods: Data were collected in November 2008. In total, 2150 Norwegian and 5616 Dutch respondents were included and the samples were weighted. The level of acceptance was assessed by measuring beliefs and opinions among Dutch and Norwegian people of 16 years and older and among different user groups in the Netherlands and Norway. t-Tests, 2-tests and multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the differences between both countries. Findings: Norwegian and Dutch respondents were somewhat reserved concerning the acceptance of illicit drug use. However, the acceptance of illicit drugs among Dutch respondents was significantly higher compared to Norwegian respondents. Regarding different user groups, even non-users in both countries showed a significant difference, with Dutch non-users accepting illicit drug use to a larger extent than Norwegians. Conclusions: According to the findings of this study, the acceptance of illicit drug use seems to be larger in the Dutch society than in the Norwegian one.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0968-7637
1465-3370
DOI:10.3109/09687637.2012.671859