Retrospective study of photodynamic therapy for pulsed dye laser‐resistant port‐wine stains

• Published in: Journal of dermatology Vol. 47; no. 4; pp. 348 - 355
• Main Authors: Han, Yue, Ying, Hanru, Zhang, Xiaolin, Yu, Wenxin, Cen, Qingqing, Chen, Xuanfeng, Qiu, Yajing, Chen, Hui, Jin, Yunbo, Ma, Gang, Lin, Xiaoxi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-04-2020
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Color; Colorimetry; Disease Resistance; Dyes; Face; Female; Head and neck; Hematoporphyrins - administration & dosage; Humans; Lasers; Lasers, Dye - therapeutic use; Low-Level Light Therapy - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Neck; Patient Satisfaction; Photochemotherapy - methods; Photodynamic therapy; Port-Wine Stain - therapy; port‐wine stain; pulsed dye laser; pulsed dye laser resistance; Retrospective Studies; Stains; treatment efficacy; Treatment Outcome; Wine; Young Adult; pulsed dye laser resistance; photodynamic therapy; port-wine stain; pulsed dye laser; treatment efficacy
• ISSN: 0385-2407; 1346-8138
• DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15238

Pulsed dye laser‐resistant port‐wine stains present a therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for treating these lesions. A total of 67 patients with pulsed dye laser‐resistant cervicofacial port‐wine stains were retrospectively assessed after undergoing photodynamic therapy mediated with a combination of hemoporfin and 532‐nm light. For objective evaluation of photodynamic therapy efficacy, first, the colorimetric changes in the port‐wine stain lesions were evaluated according to the L*a*b* color coordinate system, then the values of color changes (ΔE) and blanching rate were calculated. For subjective evaluation of improvement, photographs taken before and after photodynamic therapy were evaluated by three independent assessors blindly. Patient satisfaction was also used as a factor in the subjective evaluation. Adverse events were recorded after treatment. The median ΔE decreased significantly from the pretreatment value of 13.42 to 9.90 at the 2‐month follow up (P < 0.001). The median blanching rate of port‐wine stains was 28.04% after an average of 1.21 sessions of photodynamic therapy. Based on the overall visual assessment, 46.2% patients showed excellent or good levels of improvement (>50% color blanching). Adverse events were minimal, transient and self‐limiting. In conclusion, photodynamic therapy serves as an alternative means to treat pulsed dye laser‐resistant port‐wine stains.