Three key issues for determining competence in a system of assessment
There is widespread agreement that medical education should include multi-source, multi-method, and multi-purpose forms of assessment and thus should move towards cohesive systems of assessment. One possibility that fits comfortably with a system of assessment framework is to organize assessments ar...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical teacher Vol. 43; no. 7; pp. 853 - 855 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Taylor & Francis
03-07-2021
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | There is widespread agreement that medical education should include multi-source, multi-method, and multi-purpose forms of assessment and thus should move towards cohesive systems of assessment. One possibility that fits comfortably with a system of assessment framework is to organize assessments around a competency based medical education model. However conceptually appealing a competency based medical education model is, discussions are sparse regarding the details of determining competence (or the pass/fail point) within each competency. In an effort to make discussions more concrete, we put forth three key issues relevant to implementation of competency-based assessment: (1) each competency is measured with multiple assessments, (2) not all assessments produce a score for a competency as a good portion of assessment in medical school is narrative, and (3) competence decisions re-occur as assessments cumulate. We agree there are a host of other issues to consider, but think the practical action-oriented issues we set forth will be helpful in putting form into what is now largely abstract discussions. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0142-159X 1466-187X |
DOI: | 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1804540 |