From bench to board Gender differences in university scientists' participation in corporate scientific advisory boards

• Published in: Academy of Management journal Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 1443 - 1464
• Main Authors: Ding, Waverly, Murray, Fiona E. S, Stuart, Toby E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Briarcliff Manor Academy of Management 01-10-2013
• Subjects: Akademiker; Beirat; Biotechnology; Board of directors; Boards of directors; Experimental methods; Gender; Gender differences; Gender differentiation; Geschlecht; Organization theory; Organizational behaviour; Scientists; Social networks; Soziales Netzwerk; Stereotypes; Studies; U.S.A; USA; United States > US
• ISSN: 1535-3990; 0001-4273; 2326-6600; 1948-0989
• DOI: 10.5465/amj.2011.0020

This article examines the gender difference in the likelihood that male and female academic scientists will join corporate scientific advisory boards (SABs). We assess (i) demand-side theories that relate the gap in scientists' rate of joining SABs to the opportunity structure of SAB invitations, and (ii) supply-side explanations that attribute that gap to scientists' preferences for work of this type. We statistically examine the demand-and supply-side perspectives in a national sample of 6,000 life scientists whose careers span more than 30 years. Holding constant professional achievement, network ties, employer characteristics, and research foci, male scientists are almost twice as likely as females to serve on the SABs of biotechnology companies. We do not find evidence in our data supporting a choice-based explanation for the gender gap. Instead, demand-side theoretical perspectives focusing on gender-stereotyped perceptions and the unequal opportunities embedded in social networks appear to explain some of the gap.