Helping others or helping oneself? An episodic examination of the behavioral consequences of helping at work
Scholars have paid an increasing amount of attention to organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), with a particular emphasis on helping others at work. In addition, recent empirical work has focused on how OCB is an intraindividual phenomenon, such that employees vary daily in the extent to which...
Saved in:
Published in: | Personnel psychology Vol. 71; no. 1; pp. 85 - 107 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Durham
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-03-2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Scholars have paid an increasing amount of attention to organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), with a particular emphasis on helping others at work. In addition, recent empirical work has focused on how OCB is an intraindividual phenomenon, such that employees vary daily in the extent to which they help others. However, one limitation of this research has been an overemphasis on well‐being consequences associated with daily helping (e.g., changes in affect and mental depletion) and far less attention on behavioral outcomes. In this study, we develop a self‐regulatory framework that articulates how helping others at work is a depleting experience that can lead to a reduction in subsequent acts of helping others, and an increase in behaviors aimed at helping oneself (i.e., engaging in political acts). We further theorize how two individual differences—prevention focus and political skill—serve as cross‐level moderators of these relations. In an experience sampling study of 91 full‐time employees across 10 consecutive workdays, our results illustrate that helping is a depleting act that makes individuals more likely to engage in self‐serving acts and less likely to help others. Moreover, the relation of helping acts with depletion is strengthened for employees who have higher levels of prevention focus. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | We thank the Department of Management at the University of Illinois at Chicago and Wendy Boswell for their helpful feedback on a previous version of this manuscript, as well as Gerald Gray and NeeHao Mao for their assistance with data collection. We also thank Editor Maria Kraimer and our two reviewers for their support and guidance during the revision process. |
ISSN: | 0031-5826 1744-6570 |
DOI: | 10.1111/peps.12229 |