Integration and Application of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Recent clinical practice guidelines have addressed the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP). These disease-specific guidelines were developed independently, without clear direction on how to apply their respective recommendations concurrent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chest Vol. 162; no. 3; pp. 614 - 629
Main Authors: Marinescu, Daniel-Costin, Raghu, Ganesh, Remy-Jardin, Martine, Travis, William D., Adegunsoye, Ayodeji, Beasley, Mary Beth, Chung, Jonathan H., Churg, Andrew, Cottin, Vincent, Egashira, Ryoko, Fernández Pérez, Evans R., Inoue, Yoshikazu, Johannson, Kerri A., Kazerooni, Ella A., Khor, Yet H., Lynch, David A., Müller, Nestor L., Myers, Jeffrey L., Nicholson, Andrew G., Rajan, Sujeet, Saito-Koyama, Ryoko, Troy, Lauren, Walsh, Simon L.F., Wells, Athol U., Wijsenbeek, Marlies S., Wright, Joanne L., Ryerson, Christopher J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-09-2022
American College of Chest Physicians
Series:Chest
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent clinical practice guidelines have addressed the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP). These disease-specific guidelines were developed independently, without clear direction on how to apply their respective recommendations concurrently within a single patient, where discrimination between these two fibrotic interstitial lung diseases represents a frequent diagnostic challenge. The objective of this review, created by an international group of experts, was to suggest a pragmatic approach on how to apply existing guidelines to distinguish IPF and fHP. Key clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features described in previous guidelines are integrated in a set of diagnostic algorithms, which then are placed in the broader context of multidisciplinary discussion to guide the generation of a consensus diagnosis. Although these algorithms necessarily reflect some uncertainty wherever strong evidence is lacking, they provide insight into the current approach favored by experts in the field based on currently available knowledge. The authors further identify priorities for future research to clarify ongoing uncertainties in the diagnosis of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0012-3692
1931-3543
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.013