Thoracic involvement of type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: diagnostic accuracy--comparison of emergency helical CT and surgical findings
To assess the accuracy of various findings at emergency helical computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of thoracic involvement of type A aortic dissection (AD) and type A intramural hematoma (IMH) and to compare these findings with those at surgical confirmation. Fifty-seven patients with acute...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiology Vol. 228; no. 2; p. 430 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
01-08-2003
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get more information |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To assess the accuracy of various findings at emergency helical computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of thoracic involvement of type A aortic dissection (AD) and type A intramural hematoma (IMH) and to compare these findings with those at surgical confirmation.
Fifty-seven patients with acute chest pain underwent emergency helical CT and subsequent surgery for type A AD or IMH. Patients in whom AD or IMH was detected in three segments of the thoracic aorta or those in whom there was a site of any entry tear, arch branch vessel involvement, pericardial effusion, or aortic arch anomaly were examined at helical CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of helical CT, along with 95% CIs, were calculated by using surgical confirmation as the reference standard.
For the detection of AD or IMH of the thoracic aorta, the accuracy of helical CT was 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, were 82%, 100%, and 84% for an entry tear; 95%, 100%, and 98% for arch branch vessel involvement; and 83%, 100%, and 91% for pericardial effusion. These values were all 100% for aortic arch anomalies.
Emergency helical CT of the thorax depicts findings that are highly accurate in the evaluation of acute type A AD and IMH. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-8419 |
DOI: | 10.1148/radiol.2282012162 |