A meta‐analytic review of the relationship between attachment styles and posttraumatic growth

Objective The present review aimed to examine the relationship between attachment styles and posttraumatic growth in adults exposed to traumatizing events. Method A systematic literature search resulted in the inclusion of 14 studies in the review. Four correlational meta‐analyses of the relationshi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical psychology Vol. 77; no. 7; pp. 1521 - 1536
Main Authors: Gleeson, Amanda, Curran, David, Reeves, Rachel, Dorahy, Martin, Hanna, Donncha
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Wiley Periodicals Inc 01-07-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The present review aimed to examine the relationship between attachment styles and posttraumatic growth in adults exposed to traumatizing events. Method A systematic literature search resulted in the inclusion of 14 studies in the review. Four correlational meta‐analyses of the relationship between the attachment styles of secure, dismissive, preoccupied, and fearful, and posttraumatic growth, were conducted. Results These revealed a significant small positive relationship between secure attachment and posttraumatic growth (r =  0.21, p < 0.001); a significant small negative relationship between dismissive attachment and posttraumatic growth (r = −0.12, p < 0.001), and a weak relationship between preoccupied attachment and posttraumatic growth (r = −0.04, p = 0.235), and fearful attachment and posttraumatic growth (r = 0.08, p = 0.248). Conclusions The relationship between attachment styles and posttraumatic growth is modest and may be better explained by other variables. Nonetheless, findings provide useful information for clinicians regarding the potential small impact of attachment style following traumatizing exposure. Implications for future research are highlighted with respect to methodological rigor and the role of other potentially influential variables.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9762
1097-4679
DOI:10.1002/jclp.23156